Jerarquía y linealidad: acerca de la distribución de los gaps de desplazamiento / Hierarchy and linearity: on the distribution of gaps of displacement
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este artículo discute la posibilidad de que la distribución de los gaps de desplazamiento se determine a partir de relaciones lineales y no estructurales. Bajo la teoría de la copia, esta distinción se sigue de pronunciar “la copia más a la izquierda” en vez de “la copia más alta” en una representación sintáctica. A partir del supuesto de que no hay una correspondencia estricta entre mando-c y precedencia, un enfoque lineal predice que las copias linealizadas hacia la derecha no reciben manifestación fonológica, por lo que este tipo de configuración sintáctica no afectaría propiedades de superficie tales como el orden de palabras. Esto parece corroborarse con respecto a tres generalizaciones tipológicas: la inexistencia de lenguas de verbo penúltimo, el Universal 20 de Greenberg y la Condición de Final-sobre-Final. Se concluye que resulta necesario desarrollar una teoría articulada que permita derivar la distribución de las copias no pronunciadas a partir de relaciones lineales.
ABTRACT
This paper discusses the possibility that the distribution of movement gaps is determined by linear relations and not by structural relations. Under the Copy Theory, this distinction follows from pronouncing “the leftmost copy” instead of “the highest copy” in a syntactic representation. On the assumption that there is no strict correlation between c-command and precedence, the linear approach predicts that copies occupying rightward specifiers do not receive phonological representation at PF; consequently, this type of configuration would not affect surface properties such as word order. This seems to be attested with respect to three typological generalizations: the inexistence of penultimate-verb languages, Greenberg’s Universal 20 and the Final-over-Final Condition. It follows that an articulate theory that derives the distribution of unpronounced copies from linear relations is required.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Los autores de los artículos publicados conservan los derechos de copyright.
Licencia de uso:
Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
Citas
Abels, Klaus & Ad Neeleman (2012) Linear asymmetries and the LCA. Syntax 15: 25-74.
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg & Ian Roberts (2014) A syntactic universal and its consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 169-225.
Biberauer, Theresa, Michelle Sheehan & Glenda Newton (2010) Impossible changes and impossible borrowings: the Final-over-Final Constraint. En Anne Breitbarth, Christopher Lucas, Sheila Watts & Davis Willis (eds.) Continuity and Change in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 35–60.
Bobaljik, Jonathan (1994) What does adjacency do. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 22: 1-32.
Bobaljik, Jonathan (1995) The syntax of verbal inflection. Tesis Doctoral, MIT.
Bobaljik, Jonathan (2002) A-Chains at the PF-Interface: Copies and Covert Movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20: 197-267.
Bošković, Željko (2002) On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 351-383.
Bruening, Benjamin (2014) Precede-and-command revisited. Language 90: 342-388.
Cheng, Lisa (1991) On the Typology of Wh-Questions. Tesis Doctoral, MIT.
Chomsky, Noam (1973) Conditions on Transformations. En Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle. The Hague: Mouton. 232-286.
Chomsky, Noam (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Chomsky, Noam (1993) A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. En Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.) The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1-52.
Chomsky, Noam (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam (2000) Minimalist inquiries: the framework. En Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.) Step by Step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 89–155.
Chomsky, Noam (2001) Derivation by phase. En Michael Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–50
Chomsky, Noam (2008) On Phases. En Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero & María Luisa Zubizarreta (eds) Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo (2005) Deriving Greenberg's Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 315-332.
Den Besten, Hans (1977) On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules. Manuscrito, Universidad de Amsterdam.
Dryer, Matthew (2009) Verb-Object-Negative Order in Central Africa. En Norbert Cyffer, Erwin Ebermann & Georg Ziegelmeyer (eds.) Negation Patterns in West African
Languages and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 307-362.
Dryer, Matthew & Martin Haspelmath (2011) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.
Embick, David, & Rolf Noyer (2001) Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic inquiry 32: 555-595.
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer (2007) Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. En Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.) The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces. Oxford: OUP.
Erlewine, Michael (2015) Low sentence-final particles in Mandarin Chinese and the Final-over-Final Constraint. Manuscrito, McGill University.
Fiengo, Robert (1977) On trace theory. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 35-61.
Fox, Danny & Pesetsky, David (2005) Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31: 1-45.
Fox, Danny & Pesetsky, David (2009) Rightward movement, covert movement, and cyclic linearization. Trabajo presentado en la Universidad Ben Gurion.
Greenberg, Joseph (1963) Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. En Joseph Greenberg (ed.) Universals of Language. London: MIT Press.
Groat, Erich & John O’Neil (1996) Spell-Out at the interface: Achieving a unified syntactic computational system in the minimalist framework. En Werner Abraham, Samuel David Epstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson & Jan-Wouter Zwart (eds.) Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hawkins, John (1983) Word Order Universals. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hinzen, Wolfram & Michelle Sheehan (2013) The philosophy of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kayne, Richard (1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, Richard (2003) Antisymmetry and Japanese. English Linguistics 20: 1-40.
Kremers, Joost (2003) The Arabic noun phrase: A minimalist approach. Tesis doctoral, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
Landau, Idan (2006) Chain Resolution in Hebrew V(P)‐fronting. Syntax 9: 32-66.
Lasnik, Howard & Saito, Mamoru (1992) Move-α: Conditions on its applications and output. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Müller, Gereon (1998) Incomplete Category Fronting: A Derivational Approach to Remnant Movement in German. Berlin: Springer.
Müller, Gereon & Wolfgang Sternefeld (1994) Scrambling as A-bar-movement. En Norbert Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.) Studies on Scrambling. Berlin: Mouton: de Gruyter.
Muñoz Pérez, Carlos (2016) Three explanatory challenges for Copy Theory. En Kate Bellamy, Elena Karvovskaya, Martin Kohlberger & George Saad (eds.) Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the Student Organization of Linguistics in Europe (ConSOLE XXIII). Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics.
Nunes, Jairo (1995) The copy theory of movement and the linearization of chains in the minimalist program. Tesis Doctoral, University of Maryland.
Nunes, Jairo (1999) Linearization of chains and phonetic realization of chain links. En Samuel Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds.) Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 217–249.
Nunes, Jairo (2004) Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nunes, Jairo & Juan Uriagereka (2000) Cyclicity and extraction domains. Syntax 3: 20-43.
Nunes, Jairo (2011) The Copy Theory. En Cedric Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Overfelt, Jason (2015) Rightward Movement: A Study in Locality. Tesis Doctoral, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Philip, Joy (2013) (Dis)harmony, the Head-Proximate Filter, and linkers. Journal of Linguistics 49: 165-213.
Reinhart, Tanya (1983) Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rizzi, Lorenzo (2001) On the position ‘Int(errogative)’ in the left periphery of the clause. En Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Sheehan, Michelle (2014) Explaining the Final-Over-Final Constraint: Formal and Functional Approaches. En Theresa Biberauer & Michelle Sheehan (eds.) Theoretical Approaches to Disharmonic Word Order. Oxford: OUP.
Song, Jae Jung (2012) Word Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steddy, Sam & Vieri Samek-Lodovici (2011) On the ungrammaticality of remnant movement in the derivation of Greenberg’s Universal 20. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 445-469.
Zanuttini, Raffaella (1991) Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Tesis Doctoral, University of Pennsylvania.
Zeijlstra, Hedde (2004) Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. Tesis Doctoral, University of Amsterdam.
Zeijlstra, Hedde (2015) Left and right: explaining FOFC and the left position of specifiers without the LCA. Ponencia presentada en Rethinking Comparative Syntax. Cambridge University.